|
Revisiting the Future: Geopolitical Effects of the Financial Crisis
Mathew J. Burrows and Jennifer Harris (initially published in April 2009).
Drafters of the National Intelligence Council’s 2025 report forecast potential effects of the ongoing financial crisis on the economy, the role of the state, and the shape of world order. Will reduced U.S. political and market clout be one of the casualties?
More on
Multipolarity/Multilateralism and U.S. Hegemony>
Weak States and Global Threats: Fact or Fiction?
Stewart Patrick (initially published in Spring 2006) Little evidence underpins existing sweeping assertions about the connection between weak or failing states and transnational threats such as terrorism, proliferation, or disease, even though policy is being implemented accordingly. What characteristics of state weakness are really associated with which dangers?
More on Foreign Aid and Economic Development>
Understanding the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Debate
Christopher F. Chyba and J.D. Crouch (initially published July 2009)
Together, a former NSC official from each of the last two administrations identify eight key divergent views in the ongoing U.S. nuclear weapons policy, posture, and programs debates, and explain the most important areas of disagreement and consensus. More
on Weapons of Mass Desctruction >
The Security Implications of Climate Change
John Podesta and Peter Ogden (initially published Winter 2007-08)
Within the next 30 years, climate change is expected to cause destabilizing migration, massive food and water shortages, devastating natural disaster, and deadly disease outbreaks that will present serious security challenges not only to directly affected countries, but to the United States and the entire international community. More
on Energy and Environment>
Talking with Insurgents: A Guide for the Perplexed
Daniel Byman (initially published in April 2009)
Talks with insurgents are often necessary to end conflicts, but they can also be politically costly, fail, and even backfire. Policymakers and analysts should consider these eight questions, derived from Iraq and elsewhere, for Afghanistan and beyond More on Terrorism> |
The Myth of a No-NATO-Enlargement Pledge to Russia
Mark Kramer (initially published in April 2009).
Recently declassified evidence undermines the contention that top-level assurances were provided to Gorbachev in 1990 not to enlarge NATO either eastward or to former Soviet states. No such assurances were ever given or sought. More on Russia >
What Do They Really Want?: Obama’s North Korea Conundrum
Victor Cha (initially published October 2009)
Kim Jong-il may want nuclear weapons, but is that all? The former deputy of the U.S. delegation to the Six-Party Talks draws on North Korean positions that, even when contradictory, may explain core goals which lie beneath Pyongyang’s rhetoric and provocative actions.
More
on the Koreas>
A
Win-Win U.S. Strategy for Dealing with Iran
Michael McFaul, Abbas Milani, and Larry Diamond (initially
published Spring 2005)
In its nuclear negotiations with the rest of the world, Iran
has been pursuing a strategy of “heads you lose, tails
we win.” The United States needs a bold and fundamentally
different strategy that would engage the Iranian regime and
people on two tracks, allowing U.S. diplomats to pursue arms
control and democratization at the same time. More
on Iran>
Pakistan's Record on Terrorism: Conflicted Goals, Compromised Performance
Ashley J. Tellis
(initially published in Spring 2008)
Islamabad's inability to defeat the terrorist groups operating from its soil is rooted in many factors that go beyond its admittedly serious motivational deficiencies to combat terrorism.
More
on South Asia>
The Anbar Awakening:
An Alliance of Incentives
John A. McCary (initially published in January 2009)
The September 2006 shift in Iraq’s al Anbar province was caused neither by the number of U.S. troops in “the surge,” nor outrage at the brutality of al Qaeda’s tactics, but the Sunni tribal sheikhs’ increased sense of al Qaeda’s threat to their power, leading them to align with the U.S. military and its new strategy. More on Iraq>
|